Sewell Direct Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 20, 2008, 11:50:39 PM
Home Help Login Register
News: The Sewell Direct Support forum is no longer monitored. We appreciate your visit. Feel free to browse the posts and check any information we have.  If you are in need of technical support for something purchased from Sewell Direct please email support@sewelldirect.com or by calling 1-800-709-1345.

+  Sewell Direct Forum
|-+  Technical Support
| |-+  Software
| | |-+  Would win98 run in nowadays fast CPUs?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Would win98 run in nowadays fast CPUs?  (Read 945 times)
FrodoPLM
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« on: June 23, 2007, 02:13:21 AM »



Hi! I was just wandering... how would win98SE run in latest-tech machines (talk about dual core CPUs)? I mean will it run at all? I always liked win98SE rather than XP or Vista, but never tried it on anything faster than a P3 500mhz...
If it wouldnt work at all... then which would be the fastest hardware on which you could use Win98SE?

Thx in advance...
Logged

TiKiMaN1
Administrator
Nerd Supreme
*****

Karma: +19/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 101



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2007, 09:20:18 AM »



Hi! I was just wandering... how would win98SE run in latest-tech machines (talk about dual core CPUs)? I mean will it run at all? I always liked win98SE rather than XP or Vista, but never tried it on anything faster than a P3 500mhz...
If it wouldnt work at all... then which would be the fastest hardware on which you could use Win98SE?

Thx in advance...

Hi FrodoPLM and welcome to the forums! Grin  I'm fairly certain that you could run the latest-tech machines in Windows 98SE without any issues.  The trick however is that I do not know what type of real performance gain you would actually see.  The other thing is how 98SE would react to seeing 2 CPUS (Core 2 Duo).  In that way since the software is not built to take advantage of 2 CPU cores I think it would try to do all of the work on just one core.  In other words just one good single core CPU in the last couple years would make performance fly in 98SE.

Here is a good example:



Notice how my processor score is a 5.7.  I am running a Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 3.2GHz.  No matter how hard I try to overclock the score remains at 5.7.  Earlier this year I was actually running a Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and my score was 5.9 across the Vista Windows Experience Index.  And I got 5.9 in the processor category without any overclocking.

What's interesting about that however is that Windows Vista realizes that although the E6700 and QX6700 both are clocked at 2.66GHz the QX6700 is a Quad Core CPU and has the ability of doing more work at a given time than the E6700 (Dual Core) can do.



In my opinion then in many ways it would be a waste to take such nice new technology from today and use an old OS that would not take full advantage of it.  I have been using Vista for almost 4 1/2 months now and I love it! Grin

Hope that helps.
Logged
Jonathan
Administrator
Nerd Supreme
*****

Karma: +4/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 183


Sewell Tech Support


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2007, 01:11:53 AM »

One issue you will run into is finding drivers that support your hardware, but still run in the old OS.  For example,  Nvidia has not released any windows 98 support for it's latest line of video cards.  So if you had a really nice video card in your computer you may not really be able to use it at all.

Most new hardware will have the same problem.  Also things like the newer versions of Direct X will not run in windows 98 so you would not be able to run games or video software that require the newer versions of direct x.

Truthfully, windows 98 did not take as much processor power as the newer OSes but it didn't do as much either.  So while on pure processing power it may run faster (excluding the problem tikiman mentioned) it won't run all of the newer hardware or software you would want that processing power for.
Logged


Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Seo4Smf v0.2 © Webmaster's Talks
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!